site news

June 21, 2009

Where to begin?

First, TCORE is going to be a test site for the Same Day Appointment feature of SacDoc. Patients have already been given instructions and appointment codes, and we go live on July 1st. That's ten days from now, and I'm still working full time and trying to be a decent parent (play group, swimming lessons, swim team practice, and meets) so time to work on SacDoc has been scarce. There hasn't been any time in there for updates to this site. It's exciting, though, to see the system coming together. The challenge at TCORE is to handle the 1,500 patients that the county has decided to send my little program, which is staffed and funded for 300. If the Same Day Appointment system, along with the fierce dedication of our staff, can give us the efficiency to do a decent job serving 500% of our design capacity, it will be a miracle.

After my testimony and letters to each of the Supervisors (with a DVD of the entire SacDoc system, including source code, enclosed) I finally got some official attention. Alas, while SacDoc is focused on patient care, the Department of Behavioral Health Services is focused on finance. They stated that they didn't consider SacDoc because it couldn't do Medi-Cal billing (hmmm, they should have asked instead of making that assumption). When I pointed out that they could actually save money by abandoning the Medi-Cal billing altogether and providing care more efficiently, they seemed horrified at the notion. It might provide more care to more patients, but I guess it would decrease their overall budget. I now have a better understanding of why they've made some of the decisions they have. Unfortunately, the monumental budget cuts that the state government has proposed have yet to reach Sacramento County. The millions DBHS spent on Medi-Cal billing won't mean much if the state won't be paying the bills.

I am still working on alternatives to the county clinics that would provide care without directly involving the Sacramento County bureaucracy. In fact, the deeper I get into the workings of the county, the more I become convinced that it is the only viable option if those who need it are actually going to get care. Until July 1st, though, all my efforts have to be concentrated on TCORE.

You might also be interested in this editorial from Sierra Sacramento Valley Medicine or this story about one of my patients.

May 14, 2009

I got to the rally at nine. I signed in to testify to the Board of Supervisors at 9:30. I expected to be back at HRC by 1:00 -- after all, we were the second agenda item. At 1:00, they Supervisors adjourned for lunch until 2:00, still on the first item. There was incredible testimony from an array of interested citizens. Our item came up around 3:00, and I gave my testimony, I think, around 3:15.

I have a wealth of public speaking experience, but this is the most nervous I have ever been. Unfamiliar venue? Strict time limit? Self disclosure? Important issue? I am not sure why I was so scared. Here, though -- to the best of my recollection -- is what I said in my two minutes:

What an education! Thank you for hosting these workshops.

My name is Ron Risley. I am a family physician and psychiatrist. I have worked in the county’s mental health system since 1997, but that is only part of why I’m here. I am also an adult with serious mental illness. But for the grace of god and some timely psychiatric care, I would not be here addressing you today. I am here to remind you that, because of advances in psychiatric care, brain diseases have become more manageable and less visible. We are your doctors, your automobile mechanics, your school administrators, your boardroom executives, your gardeners, your flight attendants, your lawyers, your neighbors, your friends, your family. Yet my job, once difficult but satisfying, has become a nightmare as I attempt to explain to patient after patient that the lifeline that keeps them functioning and integrated is being cut. The very thing that saved my life is being denied them. How can I explain why a 10% budget shortfall has to result in a plan to eliminate services for 2/3 of them? That the primary care provider to whom DBHS has referred them won’t be able to care for them, because the ”mental health carve out” has already diverted Medi-Cal money to the same county agency that is now refusing to provide them care? Dozens of colleagues and patients know that these cuts will save the county no money: as you have heard here, research has shown time and again that, without outpatient mental health care, those with mental illness end up getting less humane and far more expensive treatment from emergency rooms, from jails and prisons, from psychiatric hospitals and, yes from the County Coroner. One of my patients said, “That’s not politics -- that’s cancer.”

Despite what you may have heard, alternatives are available, but have not been explored.

You are our best hope. You can ignore this tumor, allowing it to grow and disfigure the body politic. You can allow it to metastasize and suck even more money from already beleaguered law enforcement, from primary care medicine, from corrections. Or you can swiftly and decisively cut out the diseased tissue, send DBHS back to evaluate alternatives, and allow healing to begin.

Thank you.

May 9, 2009

Another rally! I'm planning on speaking at the supervisor's meeting afterwards, if at all possible. I won't be punting SacDoc, just decrying the inhumane and fiscally irresponsible plan they're voting on..

I've also attached the letter that I am giving out to my RST patients. I wish I could give them more positive news.

May 7, 2009: nightmares for doctors; joblessness, homelessness, torture, and death for patients.

Today I work in one of the RSTs, where I will spend the day looking into the eyes of people whose lifeline is being cut and try to explain to them how two hundred million dollars is not enough money to pay for the three or four short physician visits per year that keeps them from losing jobs and housing, keeps them out of the hospital, keeps them out of the ER, jails, prisons, and the County morgue. I'll have to tell them that two hundred million dollars isn't enough to even provide them with any timely guidance about whether or not they're among the ones who will be streeted. It isn't enough to tell them what to do if the County-recommended follow-up plan is for them to try to find a primary care doctor who hasn't got the clinic space, training, or time to deal with psychiatric issues. Those "lucky" enough to get referred to another program might be a bit chagrined to discover that thousands of patients are being dumped on clinics resourced for only a few hundred.

Oh, the County once again re-designed all the forms they force doctors to fill out. (It takes a physician an average of twenty three pages of paperwork to properly admit a new patient to the County system.) Now, at your expense, the forms have advertising on them for a proprietary, for-profit product... and the County (you) paid to have that advertising included along with the design of the truly unprofessional new forms. And once again, the County is paying big bucks for a new computer system without even considering a free system that is currently installed and running. They're still giving me the bureaucratic run-around whenever I try to call. You'd think after the public embarrassment of being outed by the Bee for squandering $8,300,000.00 on a computer system that never worked, when SacDoc was up, running, and available for free, they'd have learned something. Apparently not. It seems they have money for just about everything but doing what they're paid to do.

I wonder... if the County executives who make these decisions—some of whom make four or five times my already generous psychiatrist's salary—had to actually meet the people whose lives they are destroying, would they still choose to protect their six-figure incomes while cutting off the hands of those who are reaching out for help?

Some interesting rumblings are coming from the private medical community. Much of the County Department of Behavioral Health's budget comes from Medi-Cal and Medicare money that is "carved out" for mental health care, and given to the County while effectively prohibiting private, for-profit, and non-profit providers from treating patients for psychiatric problems. In their view, the County is still taking the money, but no longer providing the services. If the County finds that not providing services means not getting their carve-out money, my suspicion is that they'll decide that actually spending a little on health care isn't such a bad idea after all.

May 6, 2009: no news?

I wish. There is a lot of news, though I am finding it challenging to balance writing with doing. For now, I'm going to do and I'll write about what I've done later. And a heartfelt thanks to all those who have made telephone calls, talked to bureaucrats and politicians, and mobilized people in the community. Remember, SacDoc cards are available to leave at your favorite destinations. Contact me by email and I'll arrange to get some to you.

One more thing. I'm working on securing space for the clinic and am developing a business plan. If anyone has experience and a little time to contribute to business development, I'd be thrilled to have you participate—especially if you have experience creating or managing 501(c)(3) nonprofits.

April 29, 2009: funding?

Not one, not two, but three new potential sources of funding. Each would take a different business plan, and I am early in the negotiations. I'll say more as things become concrete.

April 18, 2009: the situation worsens

even more cuts

With even less time before the June 30th deadline, we are now being told that the cuts to the RSTs will be much deeper. The County is now telling us that the RSTs will have to discharge 6,200 patients in the next ten weeks. They are providing no resources to the already-overburdened RSTs or their patients to help with this transition.

new ways to follow SacDoc

You can now follow SacDoc developments on Facebook, Twitter, or via an RSS Feed for your favorite newsreader.

investigation

The Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission has opened a formal investigation into allegations that Sacramento County is misappropriating money from the Mental Health Services Act.

April 8, 2009: letter to the attorney general

Today I sent this letter (pdf) to the California Attorney General regarding Sacramento County diversion of MHSA funds. Copies also went to the Sacramento MHSA Steering Committee and to the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission.


April 7, 2009: rally!

April 7th rally flyer Mental Health America of Northern California has organized a rally to protest budget cuts to community mental health programs. It's Tuesday, April 7th from noon until 2:00 pm at 700 H Street, County Administration Building. I'll be there, dressed in red, handing out SacDoc cards. You can help! Email me and we'll arrange a place to meet so I can give you cards to hand out, too.

Update: we distributed hundreds of cards to participants, reporters, and passers-by. The Bee covered the rally. The Bee article glosses over an interesting fact. "[Director of the county's Department of Behavioral Health Services Ann] Edwards-Buckley said her department expects a revenue shortfall for mental health of as much as $20.5 million after July 1, reducing the $203 million available this year." Hmmmm. Two-hundred million dollars. Ten thousand patients. That's $20,000 per patient per year. They're cutting services to 5,000 patients. That $100 million in cuts to address a $20 million deficit!?! Where's the disparity? Could it be that they're cutting services ahead of administrative overhead?

April 4, 2009

we got their attention!

Last month, I poked fun at DHHS when I noticed that the web site for the Sacramento County Mental Health Treatment Center had been "under construction" for well over a year. Suddenly, the page disappeared and now redirects back to the DHHS home page. Thanks to Google's cache, I was able to get a screen shot of the SCMHTC site before we shamed the County into removing it. Hey, guys, if you can mobilize the resources to change your web site, might you spare a few moments to drop me an email?

April 3, 2009

the shoe drops

Today, after delaying until it was too late for any consumer or provider to adequately arrange for the care of our community, Sacramento County announced the damages: of the nearly 9,000 patients being served by the current RSTs, 5,000 will be denied services as of July 1st. Most will be "referred" to other programs -- programs designed and funded to serve hundreds, not thousands, of patients from specialized populations. Will any of them be able to handle the influx of new patients less than three months from now? No.

new site news page (you're reading it)

Return to this page to get the latest news on SacDoc and Sacramento County community mental health.

new donation page

Go to this page if you want to donate to the SacDoc cause.

new SacDoc duds store

Our online store, where you can buy SacDoc-branded t shirts and mugs. Proceeds support SacDoc development.

new keep in touch page

Go to this page if you want to register your email address to get occasional updates on things SacDoc or to join an online SacDoc community.

March 20, 2009

new by and for the community page

Break the reliance on government budgets. Help create a new community mental health system by and for the mental health community.
Topic revision: r19 - 2009-06-22 - 05:56:12 - RonRisley
 
Copyright © 2009 Ron Risley MD
ron@sacdoc.org